comparison of k-means clustering and DB scan

K-means:
– Assumes spherical clusters, sensitive to outliers.
– Not density-sensitive, requires specifying K.
– Suitable for well-defined, spherical clusters.
– Generally computationally less expensive.

DBSCAN:
– Handles arbitrary cluster shapes, robust to outliers.
– Density-sensitive, less dependent on specifying clusters.
– Effective for irregularly shaped clusters with varying densities.
– Can be more computationally expensive.

Summary:

  • Cluster Shape:
    • K-means assumes spherical clusters; DBSCAN can handle arbitrary shapes.
  • Outlier Handling:
    • K-means is sensitive to outliers; DBSCAN is robust to outliers.
  • Density Sensitivity:
    • K-means is not sensitive to density variations; DBSCAN is density-sensitive.
  • Parameter Dependency:
    • K-means requires specifying the number of clusters (K); DBSCAN is less dependent on this.

Choose K-means for spherical clusters with minimal noise, and DBSCAN for irregularly shaped clusters with varying densities and robustness to outliers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *